I am sitting at New York's LaGuardia Airport (my flight is delayed) after a couple days of business in New York City and having attended the American Bar Association's Section of Aviation Litigation Seminar. Yesterday's USA Today's article entitled "Small Jets Spur Concerns" was rather disappointing. It demonstrates the continued lack of understanding of the very light jet industry and air taxis flying vljs. While it's easy to blame the current and future mess of our outdated, antiquated and underfunded air traffic control system on the "blackening of the skies" hysteria of new very light jets, there is just no substantive data that supports those concerns. Reporter Alan Levin begins the article with the following: "A new generation of small jets is threatening to clog congested airline routes and is raising safety concerns, according to air-traffic controllers and airline pilots." That's a little misleading. Here's why:
The truth of the matter is that the prediction of a massive wave of vljs taking to the sky has just not materialized. First, manufacturer output has not come close to meeting production projections. Second, the economy and fuel costs have further dampened the acceleration of the market. Third, it's hard not to question the potential bias in the article related to the adverse comments from the member of the air traffic controllers' union and the Airline Pilots' Association. Both of those groups are good groups, but they clearly have their respective agendas. They also surely have some self interest in promoting the bleak message if "hundreds of the jets begin filling the skies."
Most unsubstantiated is the safety concern of ALPA's Safety Chairman as summarized by the author: "Pilots are also concerned because the small planes made by Eclipse and several other manufacturers are exempt from having to carry several major safety systems required in airliners. . . . For example, the DayJet planes do not carry the warning system designed to prevent mid-air collisions, even though the planes can be flown at high altitudes with other jets."
True, the vljs like Eclipse do not carry the same "warning system designed to prevent mid-air collisions," but the large planes likely flown by the ALPA Safety Chairman probably do not have near the state of the art, new, highly sophisticated avionics equipment in the Eclipse and even in the Cirrus SR-22 for that matter. That advanced avionics equipment makes these aircraft capable of NextGen and precision RNP guided flights. And, the concern over the slower speed of the vljs clogging the airways is also a little extreme. That's why there is vertical altitude separation. How is controlling tomorrow's vljs in congested airspace any different or more challenging than controlling the hundreds of piston driven and prop general aviation and air taxi aircraft already flying?
The vljs are indeed sophisticated aircraft. They will be faced with the same safety issues as any other aircraft. They will have incidents and accidents just as any other aircraft. Without any valid data substantiating safety trends or congestion concerns, it is most prudent to avoid the hype and withhold judgment about how they will impact the future. Anything else - at this stage - is just pure speculation.
Read more!


